Fish acute embryo test for evaluation of thyroid hormone system disruption
Commonly used acronym: FET for THSD
Scope of the method
- Animal health
- Environment
- Human health
- Basic Research
- Translational - Applied Research
- In vivo
Description
- Endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Fish embryo
- zebrafish
- Hormone responsiveness
- regulatory toxicology
- aquatic toxicity
- human health
- Environmental health
Thyroid hormone system disruption (THSD) has detrimental effects on both human and environmental health. As a rising number of chemicals are reported to interfere with the thyroid hormone system, there is an increasing need for fast and reliable evaluation methods to test for THSD. Currently, established in vivo endocrine disruptor tests are labour and time intensive and require the use of mostly mammalian laboratory animals. In the current method the fish embryo acute toxicity test (OECD test guideline 236), which determines lethality, is being adapted to include THSD-responsive endpoints (thyroid hormone levels, swim bladder inflation and eye development). In this test, the fish embryos are continuously exposed to a test chemical and development is monitored daily. At the end of the exposure, lethal and sublethal effects as well as effects on swim bladder inflation and eye development are assessed and samples are collected for thyroid hormone measurements. The test duration is limited to the non-protected life stages of fish and thus supports reducing the number of laboratory animals.
- - Fish breeding setup,
- - incubator with light/dark cycle for embryo exposure,
- - stereomicroscope for observation of embryos.
- Currently submitted for further validation by an external party (e.g. OECD, EURL ECVAM,…)
References, associated documents and other information
- - Knapen et al. (2020) Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 8491−8499;
- - Stinckens et al. (2018) Aquatic Toxicology 200: 1–12;
- - Nelson et al. (2016) Aquatic Toxicology 173 (2016) 192–203;
- - Stinckens et al. (2016) Aquatic Toxicology 173 (2016) 204–217;
- - Cavallin et al. (2017) Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 36, No. 11, pp. 2942–2952, 2017;
- - Baumann et al. IJMS. Vol 20, Issue 7, DOI 10.3390/ijms20071543;
- - Baumann et al. 2016. Aquat. Toxicol. Vol. 172 Pp 44-55. DOI10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.12.015;
- - Gölz et al. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2022 Nov;41(11):2632-2648. doi: 10.1002/etc.5452.